Foreign Affairs And Foreign Trade - 1905 Words

MEMORANDUM To: Honorable Maxine McClean, Minister of Foreign Affairs and Foreign Trade From: Monica Perez Date: November 14, 2015 RE: Engaging in trilateral cooperation: Mitigating the Chinese threat to U.S. hegemony in Latin America STATEMENT OF ISSUE: Barbados is a net importing developing country (NIDC) with food imports significantly exceeding food exports. As in most Caribbean islands, domestic agricultural output and food processing is limited. Barbados relies on imports of practically the full range of food products to meet the needs of its population. In fact, Barbados imports 70% of its food, over a third of which comes from the United States. As a result, food security in terms of food self-sufficiency and self-reliance is severely lacking. Moreover, the expanding tourism sector further fuels the demand for U.S. food products. U.S. exports to Barbados of snacks, dairy products, processed fruits vegetables, fruit vegetable juices, and seafood products have all registered increases since 2010. Fresh, chilled and frozen red meat products are also an important product category which increased by 150% since 2010. These food imports, particularly those of processed foods, are often associated with increasing weight and higher rates of chronic non-communicable diseases (obesity, diabetes, hypertension, stroke, heart disease, and cancer). Within the Barbadian population, the increased consumption of animal fats, sugar products and salt from processed foods has ledShow MoreRelatedThe United States Of Foreign Affairs And Trade Essay1119 Words   |  5 Pagesthe USA from the rest of the world. Thus, Americans who work nearly across borders but who live in the United States are not always aware of the enormous differences in the way other countries do business. As an adviser of the ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade should be know how the culture is important and may affect culture relationship and they may impact they have on financially on business venture. Financial and business issues are affected by language. Discussions between the buyer and sellerRead MoreThe United States And Foreign Affairs. Tate Tankersley.1740 Words   |  7 Pages The United States and Foreign Affairs Tate Tankersley Ms. Scannell English IV Honors December 20, 2016 The United States of America’s economy and military is far too involved in foreign affairs. Foreign affairs are policies of a government in dealing with other countries or with activities overseas, government offices or departments. The United States has always been involved in Foreign affairs since its creation. Although foreign affairs are vital for the sake of the UnitedRead MoreAustralia Essay1193 Words   |  5 Pagessocial advances rely substantially on exports and commodity values within Southeast Asia and the Pacific (Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade 2016a). The stability of South East Asia and the Oceania enables prevention against illegal activities and supports social cohesion for Australia nationally and internationally. It is also the basis for prosperity and is a resourceful trade route for Australian goods and energy sources. Australia’s top five trading partners are the United States, Japan, ChinaRead MoreJapanese Australia Economic Partnership A greement1565 Words   |  7 Pagespharmacy sectors, allowing Japan to create jobs form the ageing population instead of losing jobs (Japan-Australia Economic Partnership Agreement, n.d.). Queensland exports merchandise valued at $8.8 billion a year to Japan, with Japans long standing trade relations with Australia reaching back to the 1960’s and Australia’s help of minerals, energy security, food safety and security it made it easier for Japan and Australia to sign this agreement allowing for the development in new markets for theseRead MorePresidency and Foreign Policy Making Essay1692 Words   |  7 Pagesauthority in regard to foreign policy making, and whether the Congress ought to hold a significant role in the foreign decision making process, it is imperative to take into account the executive powers vested on the U.S presidency. This paper posits that the Presidency should be considered to be dominant, while at other times the Congress should be considered to be the dominant authority. In this perspective, it is essential that the Congress plays an important role in the foreign policy making processRead MoreUnited States Foreign Policy. The World Today Is Ravaged1292 Words   |  6 PagesUnited States Foreign Policy The world today is ravaged by weather disasters, economic disaster, diplomatic disputes, and even military conflict. The United States puts these issues into a category called foreign policy. Foreign policy is defined as a government s strategy in dealing with foreign affairs. (â€Å"Foreign Policy,† 2017) The United States has the challenge of facing all of these problems on a daily basis. Whether it is resolving issues in the South China Sea, or aiding countries damagedRead MoreThe Future Effect Of The Election Of Prime Minister Justin Trudeau1131 Words   |  5 PagesTrudeau in terms of the Canadian foreign policy in the restructuring of military intervention in foreign affairs and the pro-trade globalization mandates of the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP). Trudeau’s election defines the overriding political agenda of the Liberal Party of Canada to stop ineffective bombing missions in Syria and Iraq, yet to maintain special forces troops to better manage the war aga inst ISIS. More so, Trudeau supports the globalization of Canadian trade by promoting the positive effectsRead MoreThe United States Foreign Policy1667 Words   |  7 PagesAs Kelly Anderson’s Foreign Policy Analyst, the following memo will address three areas of the United States’ foreign policy. The U.S. has gone through may transition when it comes to its foreign policy. The United States has been an isolationist, neutralist, and internationalist country from the year it was founded to now. The executive branch and the president apply their power to influence and change the nation’s foreign policy. There are specific departments within the Executive Office of theRead MoreDevelopment of Foreign Policy Essay697 Words   |  3 PagesRevolution, there was no foreign policy for the American new found state. However, this changed with the formation of the same. The policy then consisted mainly on its regional interests and had no regards of the international sce ne. This however came to pass with the advent of the Spanish-American war. What however ought to be noted is that the regional policy had in its ideals an aim of creating an ‘Empire of Liberty’. The US had its first taste of having a foreign affairs office through the FirstRead MoreWho Is Australia s Most Important Ally Today? Essay1440 Words   |  6 PagesWho is Australia’s most important ally today? And why? The United States of America is Australia’s most important ally today. When considering what makes an ally so great, we must take into consideration a number of factors. Defence, trade, diplomatic and relationships with other countries. This essay will look at why The United States of America (U.S.) is Australia’s strongest Ally. Defence Australia is a British settled colony; nevertheless, Australian forces have fought together with the United

Malcolm X Vs. Martin Luther King Jr. Essay - 1717 Words

The Civil Rights Movement symbolized the challenge and opposition to the racial injustices and segregation that had been engrained in American society for hundreds of years. Events that took place in the 1950s and 1960s, such as the Montgomery Bus Boycott, the March on Washington, sit-ins, speeches and numerous protests define this momentous time in United States history. Speeches during this period served as a means to inspire and assemble a specific group of people, for Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X it was the black community that needed to rise up in hopes of achieving equal rights and voting rights for the blacks. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X were two of the most prominent leaders and orators at the heart of†¦show more content†¦Malcolm X and Dr. King also shared the opinion that the current political system in the United States needed reform. Dr. King and Malcolm X strived to achieve equality for blacks under the law, more specifically, voting rights, desegregation, and more representation in government and politics. However, both men differed immensely in their tactics and strategies. For Dr. King, the negotiations could be brought about by the persistence of a nonviolent plan where, the oppressed people’s determination would overcome the will of the oppressor in the hearts and minds of the nation. He firmly believed in the principles of Mahatma Gandhi’s method of nonviolence resistance, which had been successful in driving the British out of India. For example, according to King, one of the resisters, or black mans goals is not to humiliate the opponent, (the white man) but to win his friendship and understanding. Dr. King proposed a passive resistance, based on â€Å"the conviction that the universe is on the side of justice† (â€Å"Pilgrimage to Non Violence† King, 112). He claimed the cen ter of nonviolence is based on the principle of love, or understanding. Dr. King emphasized that the white man should not be held responsible for the minorities and blacks being oppressed. Here is where the two leaders oppose each other. Malcolm X felt social injustice and racism had endured too long, and it wasShow MoreRelatedMartin Luther King Jr. vs. Malcolm X997 Words   |  4 PagesMartin Luther King Jr. vs. Malcolm X Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X both fought for the same goal, but had different ways of achieving this goal. They both fought against civil rights and were leaders in the civil rights movement. The way they were brought up is a good explanation for their differences; King was brought up in a wealthy family, while X was raised in the ghetto to a poor family. Both fought against unfair laws, Social Discrimination, and Racial segregation, but theyRead MoreMalcolm X vs. Martin Luther King Jr.1723 Words   |  7 Pagesthis momentous time in United States history. Speeches during this period served as a means to inspire and assemble a specific group of people, for Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X it was the black community that needed to rise up in hopes of achieving equal rights and voting rights for the blacks. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X were two of the most prominent leaders and orators at the heart of the Civil Rights Movement. Although both leaders possessed the same objectives, theirRead MoreMartin Luther King Jr. vs. Malcolm X1263 Words   |  6 Pages* Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X are two people on different ends of the scales, with totally different up-bringings. * King was brought up by a rich black family,with a good education, and a good chance at life. He was a black aristocrat, and a wealthy man. * Malcolm X was brought up in the ghetto, and had to learn to defend himself against racist white children. He was deptived of his father, who was found dead, murdered by a white mob. His mother became mentally ill so he wasRead MoreEssay about Malcolm X vs Martin Luther King Jr1804 Words   |  8 Pagesopposed civil rights activists Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X. In the 1960’s the African American community became increasingly active in the struggle for civil rights. Although the concept race is an arbitrary societal construct based on the color of an individual’s skin and his or her geographic origin, it has had a profound impact not only on the founding and formation of our country but also the development modern American society. King and Malcolm X are two powerful men in particularRead MoreThe Civil Rights Movement712 Words   |  3 Pagesthough the actions taken by Malcolm X were of good intentions, they ended up causing a ripple between African Am ericans. On the other hand Martin Luther King Jr. identified that if people were going to respond to hatred with more hatred then there will be little chances for change and substance which was never understood by Malcolm. He was, of course, powerful and strong as an Africa American commanding huge followers and believers, but things did not end well as Malcolm X dies in the hand of his ownRead MoreMartin Luther King vs. Malcolm X Essay825 Words   |  4 PagesTwo of the greatest know civil rights speakers in the United States was Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm x. Both of these men had two very different views on what they thought would be the best way for blacks to get equality. Martin Luther King Jr. believed in his main philosophy which was non violent resistance. Martin used the teachings from Ghandi to teach African Americans how to use non violent resistance as a way to earn equality. He also believed that blacks should try to find commonRead MoreEssay Philosophies an d Tactics of Dr. King and Malcolm X1492 Words   |  6 Pagesminorities. Among them, Martin Luther King and Malcolm X had an everlasting effect on the treatment of minorities in the United States. Although their philosophies and tactics differed greatly, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X helped shape the Civil Rights Movement and make the United States a better place for people regardless of their race. Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X had different beliefs and goals for the Civil Rights Movement. While Martin Luther King Jr. took a more peacefulRead MoreMartin Luther King Vs Malcolm X1436 Words   |  6 PagesSelene Sandoval Professor Solheim History 108 CRN # 20244 16 October 2016 Martin Luther King VS Malcolm X Ronald Regan once said: â€Å"Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. We didn t pass it to our children in the bloodstream. It must be fought for, protected, and handed on for them to do the same.† In fact, American history has had a great deal of leaders that brought change by improving the lives of others. These leaders introduced new ideas, models, and theories toRead MoreCivil War Movement : Martin Luther King Jr Malcolm X1212 Words   |  5 Pages Research paper History 11.21 December 23, 2014 Civil War Movement: Martin Luther King Jr/ Malcolm X Many years after blacks had received citizenship and the right to vote there was still much bias against them. Because of their skin color African Americans hadn’t been treated fairly and did not have the same rights as whites. In theRead MoreA Research on The Civil Rights Movement1448 Words   |  6 PagesMovement (Martin Luther King Jr. Vs Malcolm X) and will be focusing on two important icons that have an important part of African American History. I am going to further discuss in this research paper, â€Å"What were the views of Martin Luther King. Jr and Malcolm X during the Civil Rights movement? What were their goals and methods to achieve equality and peace?† Both leaders wanted to unite the black race with the white race and achieve equal rights. Martin Luther King. Jr and Malcolm X were both very

Who’s Responsible for a Student’s Education Free Essays

Who is it that bears the responsibility for the student’s education? Is it the student? The school? Or is it the government? This question cannot easily be answered by just one person. The answer could be based on that person†s opinion, and opinions vary from person to person. Some people will say it is solely the student’s responsibility. We will write a custom essay sample on Who’s Responsible for a Student’s Education or any similar topic only for you Order Now Others might say it is the school’s responsibility. While others might say it is the government’s responsibility. Some people might say that it’s the student’s responsibility because the student has to show up to the class on time, be prepared, and pay attention. They could also say that it is the student’s responsibility because the student has to be willing study and do the homework. The student has to be willing to learn, and try to learn as best they can. Students have to provide the supplies that they don’t get from the school so that they are able to do the work. The student has to study and at least try to pass the courses they are taking so that they can further their education. The student has to provide their own means of transportation to the school if the schools do not, or cannot, provide it for them. The student has to pay attention to the curriculum being taught and attempt to absorb and learn it to the best of their ability, because if they don’t they can’t really learn anything. The student however can’t be held responsible if the teacher isn’t teaching the curriculum in a way the students can comprehend and learn it. This is why other people might say that it is more of the school’s responsibility, because the teachers are responsible for teaching the curriculum correctly. The students can’t be held responsible if the facilities are inadequate for learning or teaching. (The teachers are not at fault either if they don†t have proper classrooms or materials assigned to them. ) The students can’t be responsible for all the supplies they need for learning that are supposed to be provided to them. The school is the one responsible for the teachers and the facilities. The school is responsible for keeping the facilities maintained and in adequate condition for teaching and learning. The school and the government are also responsible for making sure the teachers are qualified enough to teach the curriculum they are teaching. The school has to provide equipment for the teachers and for the students, so that the teachers can teach the curriculum properly (and so that the students can learn it properly as well). The school has to provide other supplies as well and insure that the students are getting a proper education. The school has to make sure that most of the students are learning what they are supposedly being taught, and they learn how to use it in the proper way. Schools also have to make sure that the students are in the proper curriculum according to their skill and learning level, so that they don’t get far behind in their education. The school also has to use the funding they have in a proper way to help the students and the teachers and keep the buildings adequately kept to ensure the student’s and the teacher’s safety and to make sure that the facilities are comfortable enough that the teachers can teach the courses and that the students can learn the courses. The school, however, isn’t responsible for receiving inadequate funding. The schools get some of their funding from the government. This is another reason why people might say that it isn’t the schools† or the student’s responsibility, and that it is the government’s responsibility. After all, the government has to provide the school with proper funding so that the teachers are paid their salaries, and so that the facilities can be maintaine The school, however, isn’t responsible for receiving inadequate funding. The schools get some of their funding from the government. This is another reason why people might say that it isn’t the schools† or the student’s responsibility, and that it is the government’s responsibility. After all, the government has to provide the school with proper funding so that the teachers are paid their salaries, and so that the facilities can be maintainehools don’t follow the guidelines set up by the government the government also has to make it so the school is reprimanded so that the school will start to follow the rules and guidelines. All these are very valid points showing how each of the three is responsible for the education of the students that attend the schools. All three have their own responsibilities to attend to, to give the student a good education. All of these opinions and reasons are valid as well, and they show that the student, the school, and the government are all responsible for the students† education. The student wouldn’t be able to learn if the student didn’t have adequate facilities to learn in or teachers that could teach the courses properly. Equally the schools couldn’t teach the students without the funding they need to keep the buildings well kept and to pay for equipment and supplies to help the teachers teach and the students learn. The government couldn’t help the student get a proper education if the schools didn’t use their funding properly or didn’t follow the proper rules, guidelines, and regulations that have been set up. The schools wouldn’t be able to teach the student’s if they weren’t willing to learn or didn’t have their own supplies they are supposed to provide. The student, the school, and the government all have to work together and be willing to help each other to give the student a good, proper education that they can use later in their lives after they stop attending schools and stop furthering their educations. Each has to work in conjunction with the next in order to do their job in the process. This essay has attempted to show how the student, the school, and the government are all responsible for the student’s education. It has also tried to show that each of the three has their own part that has to be done in order for their goals to be met. They each have to help individually so that they all can used their combined efforts to give the student a good, proper, and usable education that can be applied to the rest of their life. It also shows how schools or governments alone wouldn’t be able to give the education to the student without the help of the other. If the others didn’t do their part the student wouldn’t be able to get an education and wouldn’t do as well later on in their life when they need their education to find a good job, to raise and take care of their family, and have a more secure financial future. How to cite Who’s Responsible for a Student’s Education, Papers

Business and Corporation Law Forrest v Australian Securities

Question: Discuss about the Business and Corporation Law Forrest v Australian Securities and Investments Commission. Answer: Introduction The aim of this report is to provide an understanding of the business and corporate law. Mainly, the report analyses the case related to Forrest v Australian securities and investments commission. The report provides an outline of the case in which it describes brief of the case. Along with this, the report analysis the various duties and responsibilities that have been breached by FMG and Mr. Forrest and also explains the reason for the duties breached the sections of corporation act. In addition to this, the report discusses and analyses the court and decision of the tribunal and also describes the reason for the decision of the court as per the corporation act. Case outline Forrest v Australian securities and investments commission, the case concerned on proceeding in the Australian federal court against the FMG Ltd and Forrest (CEO and chairmen and Fortescues shareholders), Forescues make an announcement to the border market and to the media regarding the framework series among the three state-owned Chinese companies and fortescue. The announced framework agreement consists of the financing and building services that have been provided in the connection with fortestcue infrastructure and Pilbara iron project. In 2004, FMG signed a series of the framework agreement with the various members of the Chinese companies that have been owned and managed by the government of china. Along with this, the framework was concerned on the infrastructure project related to mining in the Western Australia (Butt, 2013). Each of the agreement was outlined with the help of broad terms that what type of work was to be completed with the help of this project and how the payment of the project would be operated. There are some clauses that have been contained in the agreement that provide various information as under- It would become binding as on the sanction of the each company board of directors that has been given before a specified date. All the parties of the project recognized the agreement at the fuller manner with the more detailed in the intent of the agreement framework that will be developed later. Along with this, the announcement of the project described all the framework of the agreement that is concerning as a binding contract. On the other hand, there was some lacking point in the agreement that was likely legally enforceable. After the agreement approved from both the parties, the company announced their agreement to the Australian stock exchange that it has been entered into a binding contract with the corporation of china railway Engineering Corporation to build an infrastructure project. There was an allegation made by the company and announced the report in the press that framework agreement may not be binding. After that, ASIC carried case against FMG and Mr. Forrest that they breached a various provision of the corporation act 2001. The trial judge held the decision in the favor of FMG and Mr. Forrest but the decision was revised by the Full Federal Court according to the various points (Bryans, 2012). The court held that there has been breached the continuous disclosure obligation within the framework agreement. The Australian market will able to understand the framework agreement to mean that the agreement was enforceable as per the court of Australia (But there was misleading because they were not enforced the agreement in a proper way). Along with this, Mr. Forrest had not completed their duties and care of the director at the time of making financial statement. At the end, FMG and Mr. Forrest appealed this matter in high court and the high court reversed the full court decision and criticized the manner in which ASIC ran its case. The high court held that the announcement accurately reflected the terms of the framework agreement. Along with this, it can be held that reference to the binding contract indicated only that the parties entered into the agreement which the company had indented to be binding that is found true (Spencer-Laitt, 2013). In this case, there was real and lively possibility that the framework agreement was depended on Chinese not as per the Australian law. Outline of duties and responsibility breached and explain the reason for the duties breached ASIC was successful in obtaining orders that FMG and Mr. Forrest has breached some section of Corporation act 2001, which can be described as below- Section 1041H Section 1041H stated that a person must not engage to conduct with the relation to the financial service and financial product that deceptive and misleading or likely to deceive and mislead. Along with this, this section increase to conduct in the relation to the financial product (Humphrey and Corones, 2014). It also includes the issue of the financial product and in turn includes a security. Section 674 Section 674 is related to the continuous disclosure. The listed entity bound by the disclosure requirement in the market listing rules. Along with this, with the help of this section, the company notifies the market operator for the information related to various matter and events. Section 180(1) Forrest has been failed to exercise their duties in a proper manner and did not discharge their duties with reasonable diligence and due care and breached the section 180(1) of the corporation act 2001. Reasons behinds the breached of the duties There are various reason behinds the breached of the duties of both FMG and Forrest in March 2006 because the FMG was engaged in the deceptive and misleading in the relation to the financial product and service (Corones, 2014). The financial product defines the as a facility by which a person manage the financial risk and makes a financial investment. In addition to this, FMG and Mr. Forrest breached the section 180 to 184 because they did not exercise diligence and due care to exercise their power and discharge their duties. There were complexities in the pleading and the communication claimed to deceptive and misleading. Mr. Forrest has been breached the section 180 because it was allowing FMG to breach legal requirement that to be exposed the penalties by which the FMG and Mr. Forrest breached diligence and due care to the organization. Along with this, the case of ASIC has been rejected by the judge, which led to appeal before in the Full court and Federal Court of Australia. Discussion and analysis of court and tribunal decision In the case Forrest v Australian securities and investments commission, the high court held that representation of agreement was neither misleading nor false (Pelling, 2015). In addition to this, the court held that there was no evidence basis for assuming that a person reading the framework agreement that would understand that the parties have been entered into the framework agreement which enforced by an Australian court. It has been analyzed by the court that FMG did not need to release the full text of the framework agreement that complies with its obligation of the continuous disclosure. The court found that FMG breached various provision of corporation act 2001 as results of the public statement. Along with this, the misleading statement in the framework agreement has been made with the help of section 674 of the corporation act 2001 as it is required to be corrected. The court stated that FMGs argument had been rejected as it was only if the actual notification that has been made by FMG and Mr. Forrest has a positive effect on the share price. Along with this, the court emphasized that it was not suggesting that section 674 of the corporation act has an obligation to right information that was already provided on the ASX. On the other hand, it has been viewed that corrective information is mandatory because it would be influenced the investor to dispose and acquire the shares (Comino, 2014). The court held that the term of the binding contract was not necessary to convey for the agreement will be legally enforceable. Along with this, the court held that the announcement of the framework agreement was summarized all the content which was necessary. Moreover, the announcement conveyed that all the parties were intended each agreement for constituting the binding contract. The court relied on their finding as per the primary issue and court rejected the submission of the ASIC that the term of the binding contract has been implied as the framework agreement will be governed as per the Australian law (Latimer, 2012). In the cas e, the contract involved foreign state-owned entities that have been executed in china and it were not contained the choice of forum. The court rejected the argument of ASIC and held that post- contractual negotiations were not responsible for the prior agreements (Omar, 2016). The high court upheld the appeal and stated that Fortescue has not been engaged in the deceptive and misleading conduct as per the corporation act section 1041 Hthe claim by ASIC on FMG and Mr. Forrest of breaching the section 674 (continuous disclosure) and section 180(1) (for directors duties of diligence and due care) has been dismissed accordingly. Reason for the decision of court as per the Corporation Act The court implied that decision because ASIC pleading and stated that the claim related to the absence of a genuine basis for belief was not established a necessary element for claiming deceptive and misleading and will concurrent claims in tort. On the other hand, as the Australian court stress the limited transferability of the principal that has been relied in the present matter (Plessis et al., 2010). In addition to this, as per the section 79(c) of the corporation act 2001, Forrest was found itself to be involved in the FMG contravention related to section 1041H and 674 as per the corporation act. As Mr. Forrest was known all the terms of the framework agreement and the difference between FMG representation and them related to the framework agreement. In addition to this, the court held the decision because the term of the binding contract may be deceptive and misleading if it was used to describe the contract that has been unenforceable agreement related to the communication with an intended audience which was unsophisticated with regard to the matter and they concerning the financial statement and business. Along with this, the court has been taken decision in the favor of FMG and Mr. Forrest because the announcement of the framework agreement contained the term of the binding contract must be described on the accurate basis (Adams, 2011). It was also supportable with the help of evidence that the parties intended the agreement to be binding. The court also made expression mention that the decision of the court not to disclose the true effect of the agreement and also cannot describe the business judgment. The decision made accurate disclosure related to the various terms and condition to the business operation of a company. It can be stated that Forrest breached the section 674 and 180(1) of the corporation act that were contingent of the section 1041 and has been dismissed accordingly. Conclusion From the above discussion, the report can be concluded that the court conducted a close analysis related to the term binding contract to understand as per the reference of the intended audience. The court held that term binding contract did not convey that the agreement would be legally enforceable. From the above discussion of case, the court analyzed that the framework announcement was accurately summarized the content which is necessary. In addition to this, it is also analyzed that announcement conveyed that all the parties of the contract have been intended the each framework to constitute a binding contract. Along with this, the high court upheld the decision of the full court and stated that FMG and Mr. Forrest was not engaged in the deceptive and misleading as per the section 1041H of the corporation act 2001. The claim that the Fortescue and Forrest were breached the section 180(1) and 674 that were contingent with the breach of section 1041 has been dismissed accordingly. Reference Adams, M. (2011) Latest developments in officers duties of SMEs, Journal of Business Systems, Governance and Ethics, 6(3), p. 31. Bryans, P. (2012) Continuous disclosure: when and what?, Keeping good companies, 64(10), p. 606. Butt, P. (2013) Modern Legal Drafting: A Guide to Using Clearer Language. Australia: Cambridge University Press. Comino, V. (2014) James Hardie and the problems of the Australian civil penalties regime, UNSWLJ, 37, p. 195. Corones, S.G. (2014) Misleading conduct arising from public statements: establishing the knowledge base of the target audience.,Melbourne University Law Review, 38(1), pp. 281-315. Humphrey, J. and Corones, S. (2014) Forrest v ASIC: a perfect storm, Australian Law Journal, 88(1), pp. 26-37. Latimer, P. (2012) Australian Business Law. Australia: CCH. Omar, P. (2016) International Insolvency Law: Themes and Perspectives. UK: Routledge. Pelling, L. (2015) Fulfilling parliament's intention: A business judgment rule to stimulate responsible risk-taking and economic growth,Governance Directions, 67(6), p. 344. Plessis, J.J., Hargovan, A. and Bagaric, M. (2010) Principles of Contemporary Corporate Governance. New York: Cambridge University Press. Spencer-Laitt, D. (2013) Forrest in the High Court: What Lessons Does FMG v ASIC Anor [2012] HCA 39 Hold for the Future, UW Austl. L. Rev., 37, p. 146.